Press Releases and Newsletters2021-07-29T15:50:07+00:00

Press Releases and Newsletters

Senate Action to Extend SAFETEA-LU No Longer Imminent (AASHTO Journal)

Senate Action to Extend SAFETEA-LU No Longer Imminent (AASHTO Journal)

As reported in Transportation Weekly, Senate leaders are delaying plans to take up a six-month extension of the surface transportation act and it doesn’t appear such legislation will be taken up any time soon.

It had been expected that leadership in the Senate would attempt to move the bill late this week or early next week, but published reports indicate those plans are no longer imminent.

“We are disappointed that the Senate was unable to move the extension forward,” said John Horsley, executive director of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. “We will continue to work with the House and Senate leadership on passage of authorization as soon as that proves possible. In the meantime, we will work to assure that there is no interruption in the program when the current Continuing Resolution (CR) expires. States need certainty of long term funding as soon as possible, so they can plan for the future and enter into long term contracts that create jobs and support large and small businesses.”

Currently, the federal highway program is being funded by a CR approved by the House and Senate, and signed by the President to keep the government running at current budget levels through December 18.

House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman James L. Oberstar, D-MN, has opposed a lengthy extension of SAFETEA-LU because it would delay passage of the committee’s six-year, $500 billion plan. The measure has been marked up by subcommittee and is awaiting full committee action.

In late September, by a vote of 335 to 85, the House agreed to support a three-month extension of authorization for the highway and transit programs. The Senate, however, failed to approve the measure.

Lawmakers return to NC capital to talk sales tax (AP) (With Handouts)

Lawmakers return to NC capital to talk sales tax (AP)

RALEIGH, N.C. — North Carolina lawmakers returned Tuesday to resume conversations on overhauling the state’s tax system as soon as next spring after House and Senate Democrats couldn’t agree on a plan before the Legislature adjourned in August.

A joint House-Senate finance committee held the first of at least four scheduled meetings that could ultimately lead to approval of a rewrite that’s been batted around in Raleigh since the 1950s.

“Today, we begin the process which is really unprecedented,” said Rep. Paul Luebke, D-Durham, co-chairman of the House Finance Committee. “It’s unclear where we’ll end up at the end of the process,” he added, but meeting is “a sign of our commitment to address the issue.”

At least three state panels have considered these broader tax issues since 2000, which generally have centered on lowering tax rates in exchange for broadening the number of items and services subject to taxation.

The changes are designed to tap into transactions in an economy that have shifted toward services and technology and away from traditional manufacturing.

Bringing several dozen lawmakers together to listen to tax experts is a step forward in building the political will to approve the changes, a committee leader said.

“It’s a useful exercise for everybody to go through,” said Sen. Dan Clodfelter, D-Mecklenburg, one of the Senate’s key proponents of an overhaul.

Senate Democrats negotiated aggressively this year to lower the 6.75 percent overall sales tax rate most consumers pay and top individual income tax rate of 7.75 percent. Their plan also would have subjected building repairs, warranties and other services to the sales tax.

But Luebke and other House Democrats didn’t feel comfortable with the changes as revenues plummeted nearly 11 percent last fiscal year during the recession.

Instead, the two chambers and Democratic Gov. Beverly Perdue agreed to raise an additional $1 billion this year to narrow a budget gap largely by raising temporarily the overall sales tax rate to 7.75 percent and placing an income tax surcharge on the highest wage earners.

Raising rates is a common response by North Carolina and others states during a recession, said Bill Fox, director of the University of Tennessee Center for Economic Research, who spoke to the committee.

“Keep your bases really broad and your rates really low and you’ll have the best policy,” Fox told lawmakers. “It’s high tax rates that cause most of the mischief in taxation and change our behavior.”

Senate Democrats would prefer to approve changes when the General Assembly reconvenes in May with a new plan, but it could get pushed back until 2011, after the November 2010 legislative elections.

“I don’t know what the timeline will be but I think it’s imperative that we start working toward an ultimate tax reform process in North Carolina,” Perdue told reporters after a Council of State meeting. Perdue would be asked to sign any changes into law.

Republicans, the minority party in both chambers, sound suspicious about supporting an overhaul three months after they opposed a new state budget that raised taxes.

“Tax reform cannot be just another public relations strategy to justify a tax hike,” said Senate Republican Leader Phil Berger, R-Rockingham.
By GARY D. ROBERTSON (AP) – 3 days ago

Handouts

NC Sales Tax Refunds 

Overview of NC Sales Tax

US States and the Sales Tax 

Foxx pledges to sign climate agreement (Charlotte Observer)

Foxx pledges to sign climate agreement (Charlotte Observer)
New mayor, backed by a Democratic majority on City Council, hopes to change city’s direction on several issues.

Anthony Foxx said his first act as Charlotte mayor will be to sign the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, which incumbent Republican Pat McCrory refused to do.

More than a dozen N.C. cities have joined the campaign against global warming. By signing, the communities pledge to work toward cutting emissions of greenhouse gases to pre-1990 levels.

McCrory helped draft the measure as chair of the U.S. Conference of Mayors environmental committee. But he refused to sign it two years ago because it didn’t include nuclear power as an alternative energy source.

Foxx said he would put Charlotte on board “with the stroke of a pen.”

Foxx outlined his plans for the city Thursday, two days after he was elected Charlotte’s first Democratic mayor in 22 years. Foxx will take office Dec. 7 with a City Council that’s more Democratic, with an 8-3 majority instead of 7-4. Since the city went to partisan elections in 1977, no party has had such a commanding majority.

A Democratic mayor and a five-member majority on council could alter the city’s agenda over the next two years on a number of issues, from streetcars to city budgets.

Mayor Pro Tem Susan Burgess, a Democratic incumbent, was the top vote-getter Tuesday, getting nearly 5,000 more votes than Foxx. She said the council votes unanimously “99 percent of the time,” and she doesn’t expect significant changes.

But she added: “We won’t have, of course, the McCrory vetoes that we’ve had to deal with in the past.”

McCrory said Thursday that city government will suffer under a council tilted to Democrats.

“There isn’t any balance anymore,” McCrory said.

Here are a few issues the new council may consider:

Rental ordinance

Council members are scheduled to vote Monday on an ordinance that would require landlords of crime-ridden rental properties to register with the city.

Problem landlords would have to meet with the Charlotte-Mecklenburg police to map out a strategy to reduce crime at their properties and could ultimately lose their ability to collect rent if crime isn’t reduced.

Some Democrats, including council member James Mitchell, want all landlords to register with the city.

Foxx said he hopes the ordinance is deferred.

“I think we can strengthen it,” he said. “I don’t think it’s the best we can do.”

McCrory said he’s opposed to the ordinance, in part because it expands city government. He said he might veto it.

Eastland Mall

The council has held closed sessions this fall on buying all of Eastland Mall, to make it easier for a developer to buy the entire 90-acre site and redevelop it. The city is concerned that the large number of property owners at Eastland – nearly a dozen – will make it difficult to transform the failing mall into a mixed-use center of offices, stores and houses.

Council members haven’t talked about the purchase in public, and many are reportedly hesitant about such a complicated deal. But a larger Democratic presence in city government could increase the likelihood of an Eastland deal. Democratic council member Nancy Carter, who represents east Charlotte, is lobbying colleagues to invest in the blighted area.

Collective bargaining

In late October, during the height of the mayoral campaign, McCrory asked council members to oppose a bill working through Congress that would allow collective bargaining for police and firefighters nationwide – even in states that already forbid it, like North Carolina.

The item was sent to committee but will return this fall. Foxx, who had union support during the campaign, didn’t take a position on the issue during the debate.

Foxx said the National League of Cities is already lobbying against the bill, and that the Charlotte City Council’s voice isn’t important.

“I don’t know what the point is, other than to make a political point,” he said.

McCrory said it’s important that Charlotte’s voice be heard. He said collective bargaining could have “dire consequences” for the city financially.

“We should add this as part of our federal lobbying efforts,” McCrory said.

Streetcar

The streetcar debate has been settled – at least for the next year. Seven council Democrats this fall voted to override McCrory’s veto of a decision to spend $4.5 million on designing the line through central Charlotte.

But in 2010, that phase of engineering work will be finished, and the council may face another fork in the road: Spend more money on designing the line or freeze the project until a funding plan is in place?

Foxx campaigned on his willingness to advance the streetcar, though he said he wouldn’t raise property taxes to pay for it. Having another Democratic vote on the council could increase the chances of the streetcar advancing.

Foxx said he may make a trip to Raleigh and Washington, D.C., before he takes office to continue lobbying for transit projects, such as the light-rail extension and a commuter train to Lake Norman.

Development

In the last two weeks of the campaign, Foxx said his opponent, Republican council member John Lassiter, was beholden to developers. Lassiter said they were important to building the city and that he could work with them effectively.

One test of the new council will be revisions to the city’s 1978 tree ordinance. The changes, which have been debated for more than two years, would require developers to set aside at least 15 percent of property for trees, among other changes.

The Real Estate and Building Industry Coalition has balked at some of the changes, arguing it would increase the cost to build homes and businesses. Council could vote on the revisions in the next six months.

Budget

Foxx also said he would appoint citizen advisory committees, including one on city spending. He wants the group to report on possible cost savings before the City Council adopts a new budget next spring.
By Steve Harrison and Jim Morrill
[email protected] and [email protected]
Posted: Friday, Nov. 06, 2009

Anthony Foxx’s mayoral lesson plans (Charlotte Observer)

Anthony Foxx’s mayoral lesson plans (Charlotte Observer)

Now that you’ve won, Mr. Foxx, you surely won’t lack for advice.

As the first Democratic mayor of Charlotte since Harvey Gantt left office in 1987, as only the second African-American mayor in this Southern city’s history, and as the first mayor in 14 years not named Pat McCrory, you’ll be in the klieg lights for months.

So, first, congratulations on a strong campaign and your win. But as you well know, after you and your supporters finish some well-deserved back-pats, you’ll have to get to work. We offer some thoughts on the task lying ahead for you:

You campaigned on a theme of bringing the city together – a good theme for this era. You’ve talked about focusing community attention on the public schools – a much-needed initiative – and your intent to tutor at a school, as an example you hope will inspire others to do the same.

But as a new mayor, age 38, in public office only since 2005, we hope you’ll find some tutors of your own. Your predecessor can offer significant lessons. So can other former Charlotte mayors.

McCrory, for instance, offers a powerful example of the importance of learning. He, too, was young when first elected mayor – a few weeks after his 39th birthday. But he became an expert on transportation and used his mastery to enduring effect, championing the humble sidewalk as well as more glamorous mass transit. You’re well-schooled already in transportation, among other areas. The point here: Don’t stop learning.

McCrory’s example also proves that a mayor can have the courage to take a stand opposed by a chunk of his constituency – and survive. For years conservatives in his Republican Party have fought mass transit and the tax that funds it here. Yet his support has been steady. Another example: A decade ago, braving heavy developer pressure and a council that caved, McCrory backed a proposed ordinance to beef up sidewalk requirements in new developments. Your constituency differs, but you, too, will be challenged on key issues. You, too, can stand firm and survive.

From former Mayor Richard Vinroot, learn the value of being true to yourself. Vinroot was a widely respected and popular Republican mayor who swerved sharply to the right when he ran for statewide office. In doing that, he lost the respect of many moderate Charlotte voters who had previously admired his integrity.

Gantt, an architect who was mayor 1983-87, can probably show you plenty of scar tissue from the city’s thwarted attempts to adopt smart growth management tools. Learn from his scars. The city still needs smarter growth management.

Gantt can also be a valuable guide in helping deepen your knowledge of urban design and planning. It’s important, for instance, that you publicly let city staff planners know the mayor has their back, that you don’t expect them to sacrifice sound planning in order to avoid angering developers and displeasing politicians.

You’ve talked about listening and collaborating. McCrory did that, too. But you can raise the ante on governmental collaboration, and not just with schools but with regional environmental initiatives.

You’re a smart man. We saw you work and grow during your campaign. Now, test time is here. Study hard. Learn well.
Lessons from his City Hall forefathers: Stand your ground.
Posted: Thursday, Nov. 05, 2009

White House to Mayor-elect Foxx: Can you take a call? (Charlotte Observer)

White House to Mayor-elect Foxx: Can you take a call? (Charlotte Observer)

Resting at home a day after he was elected Charlotte’s new mayor, Democrat Anthony Foxx got a call from an aide. Could he take a call from President Obama?

He could.

“He congratulated me,” Foxx said today at his Elizabeth Avenue headquarters. “They were clearly watching this race … and looking at trend lines to see where North Carolina is going.”

Foxx said the president told him to tell him “if there’s anything you need my help with.” So Foxx mentioned the apprehension over the possible loss of the Bank of America headquarters.

“I impressed upon him the real urgency in this area to protect our relationship to the financial services sector,” he said.

Foxx said the conversation lasted a little over five minutes. He also got calls from Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett and S.C. native David Agnew, the administration’s liaison to the nation’s mayors.

“I think Charlotte has the ear of a lot of people that we haven’t had in a while,” Foxx said.
By Jim Morrill
[email protected]
Posted: Thursday, Nov. 05, 2009

Oklahoma Transportation Department deals with fund cuts (News OK)

Oklahoma Transportation Department deals with fund cuts (News OK)

State transportation officials are bracing for less money both from the state and federal governments.

The state Transportation Department, like other state agencies, is preparing for additional 5 percent monthly reductions in state allocations through June, the end of the state’s fiscal year, Gary Ridley, the department’s director said during Monday’s Oklahoma Transportation Commission meeting.

MultimediaPhotoview all photos Also, the state can continue to expect less money from the federal government as Congress put off for the second time approving a highway funding bill.

The Transportation Department planned for some of the state funding cuts by not hiring as many seasonal employees during the summer, Ridley said. The department in June hired about 60 instead of the usual 110 to help with various road projects; the department terminated all the seasonal summer workers in August.

The department will pass up buying pickups, vans and cars during the state fiscal year, he said. Usually, the department replaces vehicles when they get about 170,000 miles on them.

“They’re just going to have to run a little father than that before we trade them,” Ridley said.

The department also stopped hiring any additional employees except to replace maintenance workers who especially will be needed during inclement winter driving conditions, he said. The department also will replace any inspectors in order to make sure projects are being done according to plans.

Travel also is being restricted, Ridley said.

In Congress, another continuing resolution was approved last week that extends the current transportation law until Dec. 18. Ridley said the short-term extension, the second passed so far, will continue to fund highway programs at levels 33 percent lower than what states had been receiving.

That amounts to a monthly loss of $1 billion for states, he said. Oklahoma will lose about $15 million a month; the latest extension puts the loss at about $22.5 million, which makes it difficult for state leaders to plan ahead and could possibly delay some projects.

“Sometimes you don’t have enough money in one particular category in order to let projects,” Ridley said. “We have to have the money in hand before we can let a project.”

Meanwhile, the state Transportation Department has obligated nearly 90 percent of the $465 million in federal stimulus money for road and bridge projects, said Tim Gatz, director of capital programs for the Transportation Department. The $412 million represents funding about 172 projects.

BY MICHAEL MCNUTT Comments 0
Published: November 3, 2009
Read more: http://www.newsok.com/oklahoma-transportation-department-deals-with-fund-cuts/article/3414177#ixzz0VvKQztGM

Colorado governor increases transportation funding (AP)

Colorado governor increases transportation funding (AP)

DENVER — Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter is asking state legislators for a 6 percent increase in transportation funding, one of the few bright spots in next year’s budget plan.

Ritter submitted the request to lawmakers Monday as part of his $1.03 billion transportation budget proposal for next year.

Ritter says the additional money comes from new fees on vehicle registrations, which are producing an estimated $161 million for bridge and roadway repair and safety work next year.

“As we all know, federal and state transportation revenue has been declining for years, while at the same time transportation demands and construction costs have been increasing. Our system of bridges, highways and roadways is rapidly deteriorating and becoming a greater and greater safety concern,” Ritter said.

Democrats praised the increase in funding after years of underfunding for transportation projects. They credited Ritter’s new fee program, called FASTER, or Funding Advancements for Surface Transportation and Economic Recovery.

“FASTER means shovels in the ground and an economic shot in the arm. The people of Colorado want us to make the tough decisions that lead to more jobs, a balanced budget and a strong economy. We’re doing just that,” said House Speaker Terrance Carroll, D-Denver.

House Minority Leader Mike May, R-Parker, said raising vehicle registration fees during the middle of a recession was a bad idea.

“That money comes from somewhere. It doesn’t come from the tooth fairy,” May said.

The new fees have angered many drivers and vehicle owners, especially owners of small trailers who got socked with huge fines for failing to register on time.

Ritter said Monday lawmakers will try to reduce the impact on trailers when lawmakers reconvene in January.

Under the new fee schedule, owners of cars and SUVs are paying an extra $32 the first year, $36.50 the second year and $41 the third year.

Owners who fail to register on time saw the fine soar from $10 to $25 a month, with a one-month grace period and a $100 cap. Owners of recreation vehicles were hit hard by the fines.

The governor was required by state law to deliver his proposed state budget Monday. Instead he gave lawmakers a down payment with the budgets for transportation, agriculture and public health. The rest of the budget will be delivered later this week as lawmakers prepare for budget hearings next week.

Lawmakers said the delay was needed because their budget analysts needed more time deal with the latest round of budget cuts for the current fiscal year, which were announced by the governor just last week.
By STEVEN K. PAULSON (AP) – 1 day ago

DOT changes course on I-75/I-575 toll proposal (Atlanta Journal Constitution)

DOT changes course on I-75/I-575 toll proposal (Atlanta Journal Constitution)

The state Department of Transportation is ditching its only active privately-funded toll road partnership, according to state and county officials. That completes a 0-for-5 record for proposals in the program so far — or, DOT officials say, lays the groundwork for its rebirth.

The concept for the project, to build toll lanes along Interstates 75 and 575 in Cobb and Cherokee counties, is still very much alive, officials said Monday. The project will be announced this week as one of the highest-priority plans to get under way with a new set of rules.

But DOT will drop its exclusive relationship with the companies that first proposed it under laws passed in 2003 and 2005. Those companies, a consortium led by builders Bechtel Infrastructure Corp. and Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc., will have to bid on the project against other companies. Such competition will bring the state its only chance of closing a funding gap for the project, DOT assistant treasurer Earl Mahfuz said. To build out the entire $16 billion metro-wide system of optional toll lanes planned by the department, the state would need to fill a $7 billion funding gap, according to preliminary estimates.

Officials with the I-75/I-575 consortium countered that the project in hand would have been the best one.

“I think we worked hand in hand with the state in trying to develop the best affordable project, and I think we accomplished that,” said Jim Dell, a vice president for development at Bechtel.

The state has lurched from one strategy to another in its six-year odyssey through planning toll roads with private investment funds, trying and dropping ideas like tolling all lanes of an existing road, or building truck-only toll lanes.

A 2003 law, for which contractors lobbied, left the power to propose projects in the hands of the companies, not the state. In 2005, the law was changed to allow the state to propose projects, too. But DOT officials wearied of unsolicited proposals, and in 2007 the DOT board voted to ban them. Projects that stalled or died along the way included corridors on Ga. 400, I-285, Ga. 316 and I-20.

This year, a law that broadly reorganized the state’s transportation governance wiped out the old public-private toll road law completely, and started anew.

The state came to the conclusion that the new law meant that unsolicited projects had to go, but that’s beside the point, said David Doss, who chairs the DOT board’s committee on public-private projects. “There may be a legal decision there, but the main premise is it’s a business decision, on how to get the best value for the state,” he said.

The original proposal for I-75/I-575 was more expansive and would have cost $1.8 billion, but the companies only risked $5 million of their own money. Mahfuz said when the state issues a new detailed proposal later this year, it will expect more “skin in the game,” perhaps even inviting companies to propose leasing the road for 40 to 50 years, to be paid back by tolls.

Doss strongly criticized previous Georgia decisions to change course on projects, saying it cost Georgia enormous credibility within the contractor and finance industry. Monday, he said that would not be the case with I-75/I-575 since DOT had made so much demonstrable progress recently.

The scaled-down I-75/I-575 project would add two or three reversible lanes along the existing highway; costing about $400 million. Motorists willing to pay a toll could enter them to avoid congestion. Toll prices would rise and fall with congestion.

By Ariel Hart

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

5:18 p.m. Monday, November 2, 2009

US Railroad Head: Hopeful For January $8 Billion Stimulus Spending (NASDAQ)

US Railroad Head: Hopeful For January $8 Billion Stimulus Spending (NASDAQ)

EVANSTON, Ill. -(Dow Jones)- The Federal Railroad Administration will award $8 billion in stimulus money to develop high-speed-passenger-rail service to various state applicants this winter, “hopefully in January,” Joseph Szabo, administrator of the U.S. railroad oversight agency said following a presentation Monday.

Speaking at a Northwestern University symposium on transportation policy, Szabo said the number of requests for stimulus funds has far exceeded his expectations. The agency had planned to divvy up the money in October, but “the fact of the matter is, this is a transformational time for passenger rail. We’re taking a few more months to make sure the $8 billion is clearly invested in the right places.”

In an interview with Dow Jones Newswires, Szabo said he expects the traveling public, railroads and other transportation industries to get onboard with new passenger-rail initiatives, as they will bring needed balance to the U.S. transportation system. For example, high-speed rail lines will allow airlines to focus on more lucrative long routes. “In small communities, where air service is subsidized by the government, they don’t really need air service. What they need is reliable transportation.”

Reliability is key to the success of new passenger-rail service, Szabo said. ” We want to pick projects that will be successful; success breeds success.”

Speaking earlier, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said the success of U.S. high-speed rail will depend on public/private partnerships with railroad freight carriers as well as assistance from experts in Europe and Asia, where high-speed-rail service is commonplace. “There is no definition of high-speed rail,” he said, since train systems operate in many different situations. In Spain, trains can travel at 250 miles an hour, but some U.S. proposals are for trains to travel just 110 miles an hour.

LaHood told Dow Jones that the $8 billion allocated so far is a good beginning, but he expects the Obama administration to support ongoing passenger rail projects that could bring major changes to the U.S. in the next 10 to 15 years. He said states have requested stimulus money for a total of $57 billion of projects.

A broad transportation bill still needs to be addressed in the U.S. Senate, but that won’t happen until next year, when discussions on health-care legislation are over.

-By Ann Keeton, Dow Jones Newswires; 312-750-4120; [email protected]
By Ann Keeton, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

Padgett (Concord) wins despite late write-in campaign (Independent Tribune)

Padgett wins despite late write-in campaign (Independent Tribune)

Scott Padgett, who has been mayor of Concord since 2001, won his third term Tuesday, receiving about 72 percent of the vote percent against opponents Johnny “Elvis” Almond, who received about 19 percent, and write-in candidate Alex Porter.

Write-in votes accounted for about 9 percent, or 298 votes, in the race for Concord mayor.

Padgett said this year’s election lacked any major issues to divide candidates, adding that the economy has many people more concerned about their personal situations.

“Citizens are concerned with their own economic well-being,” he said. “Why there’s not a lot of excitement around this – there’s no burning issue, and they’re more concerned about their own financial well-being.”

While there was no burning issue, the race did have its ups and downs. Padgett began his campaign with two opponents on the ballot. Almond, a local retired business owner and part-time Elvis impersonator, and Mike Helms, a school board member, both filed to run for mayor. Helms was disqualified because he does not live in Concord.

Almond, who served in the U.S. Army’s 82nd Airborne from 1972 to 1976, said he decided to run because he wanted to give more people a voice in city government. He received 603 votes to Padgett’s 2,284.

The campaign ended Tuesday with a twist as Porter, a well-known local business owner, launched a last-minute write-in campaign for mayor. Porter and about 80 volunteers canvassed Concord’s 25 precincts Tuesday, seeking write-in votes to elect him mayor.

Porter said he decided about a week ago to enter the race, after considering the idea for several months.

“I don’t really have a yearning to be mayor,” Porter said Tuesday, taking a break from talking to voters. “I have a yearning for the system to work, and for the system to work right, you’ve got to participate. Sometimes that means more than just voting.”

Porter said he had considered running for mayor of Concord last spring or summer, but was encouraged by friends to wait to run for county commissioner. Three candidates filed to run for mayor of Concord so Porter did not file to run for the office. But he started thinking about it again after Helms was disqualified.

“I thought, ‘There’s got to be a better choice,’ ” he said.

Padgett’s wife, Teresa, and Jim Rothwell, a Porter supporter, each stood outside the polling site at the Cabarrus County Senior Center on Corban Avenue Tuesday, politely chatting until a voter came along.

“This has been one of the busiest polling places today. It’s been a steady flow of people,” Teresa Padgett said.

“Vote for my husband Scott Padgett for mayor,” she said to a voter.

Rothwell passed out papers with Porter’s credentials.

“(Porter) began hearing that people were looking for an alternative,” Rothwell said. “The only other person on the ballot is a bit of a character. We just wanted to give the people a reasonable alternative.”

Voters like Susan Carpenter, a realtor with Allen Tate, said she was excited to learn Porter was running when she arrived at the polling site to vote Tuesday.

“I think he’s very smart and capable and can take us to the next level,” she said.

Carpenter said she knew many of the candidates on the ballot including Porter.

“I’ve known these people forever and trust them,” she said, adding that she went to Concord High School with Porter.

But others remained steadfast Padgett supports.

“I think he’s done a good job. He seems to be a pretty nice man. I think he would continue to do a nice job as mayor,” said Bill Covington, 61, who works for UNC Charlotte.

Moving forward, Padgett said his number one priority is for economic development and for more jobs because ” a lot of the people here are hurting.”

“It’s not just Philip Morris,” he said. “A lot of companies are laying off.”

Padgett also said he’s grateful to all those who voted this year.

Voter turnout, which reached record levels in 2008, slumped this year to 9.14 percent, or about 6,954 of the 75,098 eligible voters in Cabarrus County.

Voters also re-elected Concord City Council members Ella Mae Small, W. Lamar Barrier and Alfred Brown Jr., who each ran unopposed this year.
By Karen Cimino Wilson | Independent Tribune

Published: November 3, 2009
• Contact Karen Cimino Wilson: 704-789-9141

Bitnami